Protected personal records
Sensitive documents remain at the authorised customer-side boundary wherever required by the architecture. The sales branch has no inherent reason to see household or maintenance records.
🇦🇺 AUSTRALIA · LETTING AGENCY
CHAPTER 05 / 06 · THE TRUST REVELATION
Property management involves sensitive details about landlords, tenants, contractors and household circumstances. Those records cannot become accessible to an estate-sales team merely because both services operate from the same office or share ownership. Kadpex's planned model gives Letting Agency its own professional workspace, branch licence and permission boundary. Customer-controlled evidence should remain within the authorised customer environment, with independent testing needed to prove that cross-profession access is denied in the actual application.
RENTAL LIFECYCLE & PROPERTY OPERATIONS · Dedicated professional environment
A letting branch can hold contact details, property access arrangements, household circumstances, complaints and maintenance evidence. Even when the estate-sales office belongs to the same organisation, those records should be disclosed only through a justified, permissioned process.
The Kadpex design separates each licensed profession and its data authority. Customer-controlled evidence stays at the permitted boundary, and shared ownership does not authorise curiosity or informal access. Access decisions must be made on the server, logged appropriately and tested against deliberate cross-profession attempts.
Tenant identity, landlord instructions, repair evidence and case correspondence deserve clear boundaries and carefully governed access.
Sensitive documents remain at the authorised customer-side boundary wherever required by the architecture. The sales branch has no inherent reason to see household or maintenance records.
Letting staff do not inherit estate-sales or mortgage-broker access because they share an office or corporate parent. Customer-controlled evidence should retain purpose-specific access and revocation controls.
Contractors and providers should receive only the information and authority required for the approved task. An operator must be able to verify who accessed what, under which authority and when.
Estate Agency, Letting Agency and Mortgage Brokers maintain independently licensed and authorised workspaces. Even if all three share a company owner, office, reception desk or CRM provider, operational access is not inherited.
For a real deployment, that must be enforced by authentication, licence checks, database/API controls, evidence permissions and agent tooling—not by simply hiding a menu item.
Sales, vendor and buyer casework require separate entitlements and scoped identities.
NO INHERITED LETTINGS OR BROKER ACCESSLandlords, tenants and property management stay within the authorised lettings environment.
NO INHERITED SALES OR BROKER ACCESSBorrower financial records, advice correspondence and lender casework require their own professional permissions.
NO INHERITED SALES OR LETTINGS ACCESSThis is an access-control architecture specification, not a claim that the current application already enforces all these boundaries.
Making a process faster is not enough. We must be able to explain where a fact came from, which action was permitted and who took responsibility.
Architecture ambition · subject to independent testing and security acceptance.Property-controlled repair and certificate references
Property manager and licensed professional approvals
Recorded escalation, supplier action and review trail
This presentation describes Kadpex’s intended architecture and capabilities. Features are not represented as production-available, independently certified or regulator-approved until the necessary tests and reviews are completed. Country selection does not establish legal jurisdiction or staff authority.