Separate from the agency downstairs
Sharing premises with estate or letting operations must never unlock borrower files. A shared office and common directors do not grant mortgage evidence access.
🇳🇿 NEW ZEALAND · MORTGAGE BROKERS
CHAPTER 05 / 06 · THE TRUST REVELATION
A mortgage case may include income evidence, credit information, bank records, identity documents and deeply personal financial circumstances. None of that should become visible to estate-agency or lettings staff simply because their businesses share a roof. Kadpex's proposed architecture establishes separate professional authorisation, branch entitlements and customer-controlled evidence custody, with only minimum necessary references permitted through approved channels. These are security requirements to implement and independently verify—not a claim that every boundary in the current software has already passed acceptance.
MORTGAGE CASEWORK & ADVICE GOVERNANCE · Dedicated professional environment
Income, credit data, identity documents and household budgets have no business appearing in an estate-agent or letting-agent view. A common owner, a shared address or a convenient receptionist is not a substitute for purpose-specific customer authority.
Kadpex’s intended architecture separates Mortgage Brokers by licensed profession, staff role, case and evidence permissions. Sensitive material remains within the customer-authorised boundary; central systems should receive only permitted metadata and opaque references. These properties must be independently tested, not assumed from UI separation.
Mortgage documents may contain income, bank, credit and identity evidence. Kadpex is designed to keep that material inside appropriately authorised, customer-controlled boundaries.
Sharing premises with estate or letting operations must never unlock borrower files. A shared office and common directors do not grant mortgage evidence access.
Customer-held originals, scoped references and controlled retrieval rights, subject to independent verification. Approved cross-profession referrals are minimal and consented; they are not mortgages or account grants.
Advice authority, compliance review and lender submission each require separately authenticated roles. The central platform should keep opaque references and proofs, not raw borrower statements.
Estate Agency, Letting Agency and Mortgage Brokers maintain independently licensed and authorised workspaces. Even if all three share a company owner, office, reception desk or CRM provider, operational access is not inherited.
For a real deployment, that must be enforced by authentication, licence checks, database/API controls, evidence permissions and agent tooling—not by simply hiding a menu item.
Sales, vendor and buyer casework require separate entitlements and scoped identities.
NO INHERITED LETTINGS OR BROKER ACCESSLandlords, tenants and property management stay within the authorised lettings environment.
NO INHERITED SALES OR BROKER ACCESSBorrower financial records, advice correspondence and lender casework require their own professional permissions.
NO INHERITED SALES OR LETTINGS ACCESSThis is an access-control architecture specification, not a claim that the current application already enforces all these boundaries.
Making a process faster is not enough. We must be able to explain where a fact came from, which action was permitted and who took responsibility.
Architecture ambition · subject to independent testing and security acceptance.Client-controlled fact-find and original-source references
Authorised adviser and applicable compliance reviewer
Versioned recommendation and approval lineage
This presentation describes Kadpex’s intended architecture and capabilities. Features are not represented as production-available, independently certified or regulator-approved until the necessary tests and reviews are completed. Country selection does not establish legal jurisdiction or staff authority.